A prime example was the trojan in 2006. There have been some attempted exploits in the past but those relied on social engineering. As of this writing, Mac OS X is virus-free. Note that I have installed Xcode and Xcode developer command line tools and in the folder /usr/bin I see the make and makefile properties.It's well known that there are no known viruses for the Mac OS X operating system despite it being on the market for over seven years. Make: No rule to make target cc'. Make filename cc filename.c -o filename This command is giving me the following output: make: Nothing to be done for ex01'.There are many ways to teach computer programming - some colleges use languages and tools that are hardware agnostic: Eclipse, BlueJ, and DrScheme, for example, are environments that work equally well on multiple platforms.At a very high level, I'll highlight the two most common reasons I've come across that are used by those who attempt to explain that no viruses exist for Mac OS X.This aspect is very important for developers and 3D artists that do not want to. Its free to use and does not require.Since I am a Mac user, a programmer, and an instructor of computer science, I'll take a stab at answering your question. Roblox Studio, available for both Windows and Mac, is the essential building tool for Roblox games. Viruses on the other hand accomplish their work without the end user knowing.Install Roblox Studio.It is also argued that Apple has taken a big picture approach to security as it applies to operating system design and implementation. A common argument is that writers would rather focus on creating viruses and malware for Windows.Reason 2 - Mac OS X is a modern operating systemSome will say that OS X is a modern operating system that is built on a secure UNIX foundation. There's no doubt that Mac OS X has a significantly smaller market share than Windows.The whole hacker culture is windows based. Mac OS X is inherently more secure, it is shipped with more possible openings closed off, OS X warns you if something you are opening has been downloaded from the internet. So much for the scarcity argument.I'll go with multiple reasons. Apple endorses antivirus and security software on MacsThere were viruses for Vista when it was in beta and there were only a few thousand or tens of thousands of copies in use. Apple Officially Recommends Antivirus Software Also, do you think Mac users should run security software? Simply post your response or feedback in the comments section below.Note that a more recent trend over the past few years is for attackers to exploit the software installed on an operating system and not necessarily the operating system itself.
Why Do Game Programmers Use S But Never Make Games Mac OS XThere is not much point in the Chinese, the KGB, the Russian gangsters or whoever in spending a lot of money developing fancy tools for hacking Macs. So far Macs have been used by individuals and small businesses (and a few larger businesses). If you hack into some windows machines you gain access to bank files, credit card databases, government databases, electric utilities and so on. If you hack most Macs you get access to photographs, brochures, keynote presentations, school assignments, price lists, music and movies. They probably need a certain critical mass to get started attacking OS X.It may be that the big money is in hacking a small subset of windows machines. Apple is enjoying its largest market share since the 1980s. Because it is amongst the most inherently secure commercially-available operating systems on the market.The whole "security through obscurity" argument is nothing but a cop-out for those who either can't understand why or simply refuse to admit that the Mac is a very secure platform. Part of the reason linux hackers attack windows is to prove how inferior it is.There is only one reason and one reason alone as to why there have been no known viruses to date for Mac OS X. Sometimes they view the whole thing as a game, sometimes they're zealots for this or that cause, and sometimes they have a vendetta against a person or organization.Basically, professionals tend to act "rationally" (at least within the context of their world), whereas amateurs are driven more by ego, pride, and emotion.John's response certainly accounts for the pros, but why don't amateurs attack macs? Because there are a lot of people out there who harbor an irrational and intense hatred of Microsoft, but not very many who feel the same way about apple. At least within a small group, they want people to know that they were responsible for the attack on XYZ company. If they're going to last, they don't care about bragging rights or "proving" themselves, and they certainly wouldn't write a virus and release it into the wild for "fun" because that would increase the chances of being caught.Amateurs, on the other hand, tend to be all about proving how powerful they are. Mac users store financial information on their computers just like everyone else. It is fairly common knowledge that Mac users, on average have both higher incomes and higher disposable incomes, especially due to their perception as nothing more than a high-end "luxury" item. Linux is used by what - 1% of the market?The argument that there's nothing worthwhile to be found on Macs does stack up well either. Even if that remotely held the tiniest bit of water, then how does one explain the fact that the Classic Mac OS had several (relatively speaking) well known viruses/attacks, especially when their market share was much lower in those days? Even more telling is the existence of hundreds of different kinds of malware out there which are written for linux. If one honestly thinks that it's simply not "worth it" to try and exploit damn near 1/10th of a pie that's as big as the computer market, then they're delusional. Software update for mac os x 1068In terms of computers that's eons, yet nothing has gotten out into the wild - even despite the fact that there have been full-fledged contests held to exploit the system.I'm not so naive to think that there might never be any kind of malicious code released to exploit the Mac, but neither am I so naive to think that there hasn't been countless numbers of people out there who have tried unsuccessfully to do so over almost an entire decade's time.There's only one answer to this question. OS X has been on the market now for almost 8 years. It is impossible to fathom that untold numbers of hackers simply give the Mac a free pass and leave it and its users to their own devices totally unscathed. ![]() It's generally not worth the effort or time. People just don't care to attack it. :(Again Mac CANNOT be more secure than any other OS can because there's always someone out there that can crack that code because there will be some kind of security hole in every system ever made WINDOWS, LINUX, OR MAC. I generally don't care for macs but the funny thing is I HAVE ONE. And mac for that one reason. It is this virulent behaviour that makes a virus a virus. I suspect you are not a programmer either, as any programmer knows that writing malicious code is the (relatively) easy part - the real trick is getting unwitting victims to run them and pass them on to their friends without them knowing about it. I'm not a hacker I'm just looking at it from a hacker's standpoint."Not worth the effort? Tell me who wouldn't like to see someone wipe the smug, superior grins off all Mac users by writing the first successful virus for OS X? The kudos would be beyond most virus writers wildest wet dreams.But, as you admit, you're not a hacker, so I don't see how you can possibly comment from "a hacker's standpoint". It's generally not worth the effort or time. People just don't care to attack it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorNicole ArchivesCategories |